<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title type="text">博客园_风云_分类_杂项</title><id>http://feed.cnblogs.com/blog/u/13626/category/76919/rss</id><updated>2012-06-04T02:02:41Z</updated><generator>feed.cnblogs.com</generator><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/netcasewqs/category/76919.html"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feed.cnblogs.com/blog/u/13626/category/76919/rss"/><entry><id>http://www.cnblogs.com/netcasewqs/archive/2011/04/11/2012249.html</id><title type="text">一次性能优化最佳实践</title><summary type="text">上周五下班前，在Repository兄测试NLiteMapper和EmitMapper的文章中,发现了令我跌破眼镜的性能悬殊对比12283ms : 7ms。真不可思议，与是便把EmitMapper的源代码和OOMapper 的源代码一起下载下来，以Release模式的方式做一个公平对比。测试代码仍然沿用Repository兄的，代码如下：public class SimpleClassFrom { public long ID { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } public .</summary><published>2011-04-11T03:28:00Z</published><updated>2011-04-11T03:28:00Z</updated><author><name>风云</name><uri>http://www.cnblogs.com/netcasewqs/</uri></author><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/netcasewqs/archive/2011/04/11/2012249.html"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/netcasewqs/archive/2011/04/11/2012249.html"/><content type="html"/></entry><entry><id>http://www.cnblogs.com/netcasewqs/archive/2006/11/22/568653.html</id><title type="text">一个技术为主的博客沦落为娱乐休息的场所</title><summary type="text"/><published>2006-11-22T06:15:00Z</published><updated>2006-11-22T06:15:00Z</updated><author><name>风云</name><uri>http://www.cnblogs.com/netcasewqs/</uri></author><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/netcasewqs/archive/2006/11/22/568653.html"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cnblogs.com/netcasewqs/archive/2006/11/22/568653.html"/><content type="text"/></entry></feed>
